- Local time
- Yesterday, 23:21
- May 9, 2013
The picture is indeed there.The picture in the OP is not real?
It's not intended to be referential even though it is explicitly stated?
It's a random image that means nothing even though it's explicitly stated that it's referential to the context of this thread?
The picture has no added words, you can interpret it for yourself, which it seems you have done, and it seems you are claiming that by the picture being there, that reasons some "absolute." The text below the image says that it is indeed referential to my point and to the thread, but your claiming that I "absolutely" did something other than what is denotationally stated, is incorrect.