I like it better around here when people are arguing - I guess that's the calling card of one who's Fe suppresses Ti???
I picked every type that I could possibly be. ISTP, INTP, ISFJ, ESTP, INFJ
Also,
@Chad, what the hell man! Are you actually trying to learn about typology or are you trying to make other people see it your way? I doubt you even read his posts. You seem to have an affinity for touting your age/wisdom/experience/observations while totally ignoring anybody that you
perceive to be arguing, making off-topic generalizations and trying to garner public suppourt.
Also also, Ne and Se can't really be used simultaneously. I'm not just saying that because it's obligatory for MBTI to work - I'm saying it because they are both perceiving functions and they are activated in very different ways by the brain. They contradict each other.
The way I see it, Ne overrides Se. If you perceive via Ne then you are using Ne; Se can't be activated because the description is not satisfied (
i.e. requires focus, localization).
The information gathered via Ne has to be filtered or it is useless. It does not discriminate in the connections it makes; it's like a flashlight in the dark: it just shines light on everything.
Ti still needs to decide if the perceptions are logical or if they are to be discarded, Si operating in the background discerning
which perceptions have been categorized already and which perceptions are novel. Ti processing accepts these distinctions in a concrete way from Si, and is free to pass judgement based on the sensory information provided.
Se, on the other hand, is focusing on concrete details in the environment.
It is perception directly generated by raw sensory data: unadulterated. It is more powerful in that regard, where perceiving data is concerned. Se is backed by Ni in the same way that Ne is backed by Si: Ni readily discerns which perceptions are meaningful by
extrapolating potential variables and their outcomes. Like Si, Ni recognizes what has been seen before, but it does so in an abstract way, foreseeing potential implications, end scenarios, obstacles,
etc... this is fundamentally different from the way Ne sees the same conclusions.
Both forms of intuition require sensory data to operate.