Recent content by SEPKA

Does chess count? Or weiqi? Or ...?

When emotion is correctly emulated by AI technology, you will realize that it is just another method of using logic. Then you won't fear it anymore, as everyone have just turned rational. Sorry for the unstated assumptions.:segen:

Sorry my guess is that DOS is "denial of service", but what is "ddosed"? It seems like the server is still unstable. I used downforeveryoneorjustme.com to check, sometimes it is up, sometimes it is down.

I usually go to an empty room with furniture. Then laugh like a hysteria maniac, rolling, jumping, all the while messing up the furniture. It worked quite well. 10 months ago a neighboor discover me doing that, and it caused quite a fuss. I changed place almost instantly.

I remember the top 10 popular occupation for INTP include Food Centre Cleaner. It have nothing to do with the preference though. You should looks at the methodology of whatever article that suggest INTP to be forest ranger.

I think that the conclusion in the article is still being disputed in the psychology world. The line devided between behaviorist (reward->more creative) and cognitive (reward->less creative). The study does not seem to take other variable into account, such as the method of rewarding. I don't...

[sarcasm_mode:=on] I suppose that distort perception to fit the theory into it is quite a good practice. [sarcasm_mode:=off]

I think it have something with Si function. A long description of INTP on the Internet said that INTP love the border between civilization and nature (or something like that). I love to go to the forest for adventure, but Forest Ranger might be too far for me, I will just chicken out.

I also use OED, Wolfram, EB and Wikipedia. For Philosophy's concept I go to Stanford University website (it's good that there are usually discussion there too, not just definition, or even dispute over definition). For everyday life word that I don't know, I just use google, or Urban Dictionary...

Kinetic energy in particle can change depending on your frame of reference. So I think we should set a frame of reference to be the means position of all the particle in the object. That would reduce the problems as cryptonia said, that a rolling bounder don't increase in heat. Internal energy...

When I say heat is energy transfer I refer to the amount of energy transferred, not the process of transfer. The change in internal energy is necessary either potential or kinetic (electric/nuclear/gravitational are all count under potential). Sorry for mistaken about heat only concern with...

Even conservation of energy no longer valid. Replaced by conservation of mass-energy (thanks to Einstein's equation). Read http://www.applet-magic.com/noetherth.htm for proof on conservation of energy. In essence, it shows that conservation is due to the symmetry of physical laws across time...

I purposefully use fallacy to make false conclusion to lure people into doing bad stuff. Would that count?

No no no heat is the change in total kinetic energy of particle. Heat is not an energy in itself but a change in energy (analogy to impulse being a change in momentum not momentum itself).

I think we need to define manipulation more precisely. Does acting someway to convince others to do what you want manipulative? If yes, then I dare say everybody is a manipulator. Does the act only played with the person's emotion? INTP might not be good at this. Does the act you convince others...