• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • See https://www.intpforum.com/threads/upgrade-at-10-am-gmt.27631/

build a football team using mbti types.

aiyanah

_aded
Local time
Today, 17:35
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
233
groundwork
- you may have as many duplicates of any type you want
- types by position aren't necessary but they are fun (rotation options can be noted with a / )
- for purposes of consistent theorycrafting we'll be using a 4-3-3 formation for anyone who decides to fill out a roster
- the boardroom, the manager, assistant manager, minimum of 3 coaches, captain and vice-captain must be given a type
- up to 5 additional personalities may be added to the boardroom
- no more than 9 coaches are permitted
-playing staff is capped at 22 (2 personalities for each position)



Boardroom:

Owner:
CEO:

Coaching Staff:

Manager:
Ast Manager:

coaches:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Playing Staff:

Captain:
VC:


Squad Positions

GK -
RB -
CB -
CB -
LB -
DM -
CM -
CM -
RW -
LW -
ST -
i'll get started on mine after dinner :tinykitball:
 

aiyanah

_aded
Local time
Today, 17:35
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
233
dinners done lets go.
promise my team wins any competition.

Boardroom:

Owner: INTJ
CEO: ENTP
+ ENFP

Coaching Staff:

Manager: ISFP
Ast Manager: INTP

coaches:
-ENFJ
-ENFJ
-INFP
-ESTJ
-INFJ
-ISFJ
-

Playing Staff:

Captain: ESTP
VC: ISFJ


Squad Positions

GK - INTP / INTJ
RB - ENFJ
CB - ISTJ
CB - ESTP
LB - INFJ
DM - INTJ
CM -ENTJ / ISTP
CM - ISTP / ENTJ
RW - INFP
LW - ESFP
ST - ENFP
will fill out the rest of the squad later, maybe coaches too.
 

Serac

A menacing post slithers
Local time
Today, 16:35
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
2,429
Location
Stockholm
ceo and all management should obviously be ENTJ.

as for the players, obviously no INTPs – lest they'll stop in the middle of the match and start thinking about the meaning of life, etc. Probably no ISTPs either, they are terrible with physical activity in my experience.
 

aiyanah

_aded
Local time
Today, 17:35
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
233
ceo and all management should obviously be ENTJ.

as for the players, obviously no INTPs – lest they'll stop in the middle of the match and start thinking about the meaning of life, etc. Probably no ISTPs either, they are terrible with physical activity in my experience.
lol really not even one of the players?
i like a goalkeeper being an intp, can observe the game from within the game.
and the 2 istp's i've come across in life were physical specimens...or at least very strange experiments by nature where they had gangly limbs but endless energy...literally endless.
perhaps the catch is that they have no middle ground in regards to athletic talent.

but I digress, would an entj manager and ceo clash at all?
 

aiyanah

_aded
Local time
Today, 17:35
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
233
look at these loons, they won't even use the damn format.
fuckin A could have spent those 4 minutes rolling a blunt :tonberry:
 

~~~

Active Member
Local time
Today, 16:35
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
363
Boardroom:

Owner: ENTJ
CEO: INTJ
Philosopher: INTP
Jester: ENTP

Coaching Staff:

Manager: ESTP
Ast Manager: ISTJ

coaches:
-ENFJ
-INFJ
-ENFP
-INFP
-ISTP
-ISTJ
-

Playing Staff:

Captain: ESTP
VC: ESTP


Squad Positions

GK - ISTJ
RB - INTJ
LB - INTJ
DCR - ISTJ
DC - ESTP
DCL - ISTJ
ACR - ISTP
AC - ESTP
ACL - ISTP
RF - ESTJ
LF - ESTJ
 

aiyanah

_aded
Local time
Today, 17:35
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
233
look at this guy changing the formation on us.
5-3-2 huh, ok, i admit i like what you've done with the centerbacks, i would question the striker pairing, perhaps they'll clash perhaps not.
but nice team.
i especially like the boardroom but still reckon my setup with a 4-3-3 would win.
 

~~~

Active Member
Local time
Today, 16:35
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
363
Well I tend to regard it as a 2-3-3-2 formation. Not a formation that I've seen. Probably closer to the original formations. Recent formations have been reverting to be more akin to the original formations and by my reckoning will end up being 2-3-3-2 in the long term - which could be decades away. Essentially it gives equal weight to defence and attack. Decent teams know that you cannot win being defensive.

Hence, your formation will struggle in attack against mine - even with attacking wing-backs. If you use attacking wing-backs then they'll - be playing out of position, shooting from acute angles and running dead. If you cannot attack you cannot win.

As for the striker pairing - yeah, I questioned that myself. The specific types for the players might need more thought. Someone else might come up with better types in that regard.
 
Top Bottom