Input, you want to gather information, add to your achieve, you may collect things. Intellecution, You like to think, considering the surrounding themes, you like to think about the information you collect and about new ideas. Your Deliberative side is probably somewhat a consequence of your Major input, Intellection and ideation. Input is higher than ideation, does this mean your caution is realistically based on facts? On the other side there's ideation... I would say you're a tad paranoid.Connectedness sounds like the intuition/feeling of your lot. According to what I'm reading, it implies a sort of ethics and humanity.
Hmm, on your MBTI was your intuition and introversion particularly high? I'm somewhat surprised you wouldn't be a J type.
From what little I understand of this, I would suspect that the first three themes are relevant to our MBTI. How is what I want to know.
There is a thread at StrengthFinders relating to the MBTI. I went through it looking for other results. They have common themes. If the person posting did not put the themes in correct order I did not take count of theirs.
1. Ideation- Idea oriented, excited by new ideas, new angles, enjoys complexities (in an idea/sub form)
2. Deliberative- Introverted, quiet and careful, maybe too serious.
3. Learner- Likes to learn and be involved with learning (the journey). This implies that the person seek experience, expertise and classes in order to learn more.
4. Analytical- The "prove it" factor. Eveything should have a reason and be rational.
5. Command- Must have things correct and push views on others and encourage people to take risks
Deliberative, in this case, is probably linked to ideation and learner. This person seems like a serious learner and curious. They go out of their way to learn things and think of things, yet at the same time, take a catious route and keep to themelves. The Analytical and Command seem like results of the major three again. They are obviously connected. A person who is facinated by learning and ideas is going to want things to be crystal clear and doesn't want bull shit to ruin the experience. Hence Command. The Analytical is easily related to both the careful desire for ideas and the command inferior.
/cut/
Strategic
Learner
Achiever
Ideation
Activator
There were two strategic INTPs, but one put that the order was not necessarily right. I did not take that INTPs for that reason.
Strategic actually emplies an INTJ. This is a sorter, someone who shifts through what is worthy and what isn't. Learner is supported by this, the fact that the person actively tried to learn and experience new things. The Achiever theme means that the Strategic Learner must accomplish something of value (everyday), probably personal value. Since it's third I find is suspiciously relative to an INTJ's third function, feeling. Least that is what it reminds me of.
The ideation and activator are inferior. The ideation I already know has to do with a love of new ideas, things that are trivial. Is this a result of Strategic, Learner and Achiever? Not so much. Actually, this strikes me as an implication of what I already thought by time I got to Achiever, this means the major themes are subjectively chosen on what the person finds interesting. Not that they are subjective overall, but have their own mind abou them. This is probably where the J/P preference is determinded with this person. The first three parts almost scream J type.
Activator is an impatiences, a doer sort and a learner sort. I suspect these two inferiors throw off the person's MBTI type. This person obviously wants to make a plan then get things done, at the same time they can handle the unexpected and want to experience and learn. At the end of the day they have to be able to say they did something, even if it wasn't exactly what they expected. May be optimistic. Reminds me of a friend who was probably an ISTP- though in her case she would most definitely have some kind of active theme, while this person doesn't.
/cut/
INTJ/INTP- This person claimed to be on the fence.
Restorative
Intellection
Ideation
Input
Adaptability
This person has the desire to fix and change things. Either for a normal purpose or customizable. The intellect part says that this person likes to think and reflect. My guess is that thinking is mostly put towards fixing/changing things and that may be according to ideation. It may be somewhat trivial. The Input is a collector, of knowledge or tangible things. The Adaptability one is in regards to being able to change when need be. However, it says it doesn't necessarily mean that the person doesn't plan. They may plan for the unexpected and thus be ready and willing to deal with it. Ideation and Adaptability are probably where this person becomes and INTP instead of a J. I take it they're probably easy going enough to handle the unexpected, but they know the unexpected might happen. Ultimately, INTJs are also an Idea type. There's nothing to say that this person is particularly well planned out, however.
/cut/
There were two unsure about the F/T axis.
INTP/INFP
Ideation
Intellection
Input
Strategic
Belief
Ideation at the very top inplies the person may very well be an INFP. I ideation is curiosities, newness and maybe trivial. With intellect, this person likes to think. They also have Input after the intellection. Meaning they like to "collect". The only theme that offsets INFP is the strategic, in which they sort through ideas and things. What is worthy and what isn't? That could also be subjective, therefore this person would appear to be an INFP. What confuses INFPs about the T/F factor is that they think and that they consider ideas and are philosophical. Belief has to do with values and the fact that it makes an appearance all but convinces me this person is an INFP.
/cut/
- Context
- Learner
- Restorative
- Input
- Intellection
Finally, this is the last sample I took. The Context one is kind of funny. It's basically there to explain to this particular person how things have come to be and to help them put the learner part into context- probably. Learner is the desire to learn by whatever means. Maybe everything is a learning experience. I find restorative ironic after Learner. Seeing as restorative is about taking it a part, learning about it, and putting it back together again. Restorative strikes me as a contributor to Learner and Context the desire to understand what is learned. Input as a collection between Intellection and restorative. I would take this to be a very literal collectiveness as well as intellectual. If I went into this person's house I would at least expect to see a huge book shelf or some kind of collectiveness. Maybe a lot of random things. This person's themes actually strike me as someone who could be on the S/N axis and/or the F/T. Although it's kind of strange for a Sensor to be particuarly curious. I guess that throws out the s/n idea. They're probably an INTP, I'm just not sure how they would use Context.
/cut/
I'll have to think about this. Maybe it's useable, maybe it's too random...
