- Local time
- Today, 12:07
- Aug 26, 2010
No. The farmer can do whatever he wants. He is free to like wild animals. That's completely irrelevant. Of course the starving people are free to kill the farmer but hey also irrelevant.Are you saying it's the farmers responsibility to feed all humans? If the farmer instead want to use the land to feed wildlife, shouldn't they be free to do so?
Maybe the farmer likes wild animals better then vegetables?
"Is it sociopath to think that one could solve the meat production problem with producing food less efficiently."
This is what I am making fun of. The hilariously short sighted solution of doing things worse to make things better.
How on earth is it not? If it wasn't people wouldn't do it. (I mean cheaper to eat meat not food in general)There a reason you go into pretty much every thread that I have a discussion/debate in and come at me with this kind of passive-aggressive shit?
Except it's not.
Oh don't play victim. It's not passive-aggressive there's no hostility don't pretend it's anything more than making fun of the absurd socially manipulative/one sided construction of your posts. This is the first time in ages (but I have a short memory so...) and if it makes you feel better I don't specifically target you or anyone. (although maybe subconsciously I thought you have hope/could take it better. Alternatively you may just happen to post socially manipulative one sided posts more often.)