• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • See https://www.intpforum.com/threads/upgrade-at-10-am-gmt.27631/

why I have given up on cosmology /space science

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:49
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
469
i think the whole endeavor is useless and fruiltless

examine and predicting objects thousands of light years away, black holes, dark matter., galaxy, unknown stuff. wasting billions of dollars on the next telescope.

trying to predict the law of physics on space while still on earth bounded by gravity.

Why dont people predict what space is like and how it works when they are actually living in outer space, instead of being stuck here on earth.

it makes no sense to predict an alien enviroment when you are bounded by limitations of earth, your whole pradigm is limited by things you see, taste and touch on earth,
 

Hadoblado

think again losers
Local time
Today, 09:19
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Messages
5,435
"Why don't we just solve the problem before we understand it".
 

Serac

A menacing post slithers
Local time
Today, 00:49
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
2,100
Location
Stockholm
I see the validity of that argument. Seeing a picture of a black hole doesn't really change anything on earth. Some people complain about the small amount of funds that are being given to NASA compared to other government expenses, but then the question is: what's the use of pictures of dark holes when we're dealing with the shit show down here on earth, and when all of our real technological progress has nothing to do with space.

On the other hand, there are some useful aspects of space research. We obviously use satellites for a lot of useful stuff, Elon Musk our Great Savior might ship us over to Mars, etc.
 

Pizzabeak

Heyoka
Local time
Yesterday, 16:49
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
2,329
No one is predicting an alien environment. Who said that? I think Bill Gates was the first to say they should reduce Nasa funding because there are so many problems here on Earth. Without space or physics there's no philosophy.

In other words you want Earth to get impacted by an asteroid so we all die. That's the real point of space research. I think you're all just miserable probably over some chick so you just copy each other and think how best to attract girls, waiting for virtual reality the savior to arrive so instead of doing "real" stuff you can just load a program up, probably virtual porn with crisp, HD graphics (the current graphics all suck) and get off on that instead? From the sounds of it that must be it, don't attack me for saying it. What's the shit show and if you think about it, why is there one and why won't it end, whose fault is it really?
 

lightfire

._.
Local time
Yesterday, 18:49
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
240
I find stuff in astronomy fascinating, but besides the stuff that is relative and practical to us, I'd rather focus on us here on earth too.
 

Pizzabeak

Heyoka
Local time
Yesterday, 16:49
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
2,329
I find stuff in astronomy fascinating, but besides the stuff that is relative and practical to us, I'd rather focus on us here on earth too.
Because in the event of overpopulation “migrating to other planets won’t solve that problem.”
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:49
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
469
 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:49
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
469
No one is predicting an alien environment. Who said that? I think Bill Gates was the first to say they should reduce Nasa funding because there are so many problems here on Earth. Without space or physics there's no philosophy.

In other words you want Earth to get impacted by an asteroid so we all die. That's the real point of space research. I think you're all just miserable probably over some chick so you just copy each other and think how best to attract girls, waiting for virtual reality the savior to arrive so instead of doing "real" stuff you can just load a program up, probably virtual porn with crisp, HD graphics (the current graphics all suck) and get off on that instead? From the sounds of it that must be it, don't attack me for saying it. What's the shit show and if you think about it, why is there one and why won't it end, whose fault is it really?

no, i want at least focus on mass immigration/exodus to space before conduct any more space research and waste millions about celestrial objects there are trillions of light years away, although throwing an asteroid on earth would help.

the enviroment and laws in space are different from earth in so many ways , so its useless to image what space is like when you are stuck on earth. the future on space research must come from either sending more people (like thousands or millions) to space , so they get accustomed to more alien enviroment outside earth, or sending AI probes to do the job for us.

the human brain is limited by what we see and touch here, so its feeble for many people to imagine what the outer space enviroment is like, its laws etc when we are stuck on the ground.
 

Cognisant

Prolific Member
Local time
Yesterday, 12:49
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
8,277
Developing new launch systems is a lot more expensive than sending up a camera with a bigger/better lens.

That being said new more efficient launch systems are under development, although that suffers from the same problem, developing a slightly better rocket is cheaper than developing ground to orbit mass driver technology from scratch.

 

sushi

Active Member
Local time
Today, 00:49
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
469
we cant even send more than 10000 people into space at this rate. a shuttle/rocket can at most carry 5 to 10 people
 
Top Bottom