I can see why it may appear that way. I've actually been quite busy over the past two weeks. Furthermore, sometimes I do not reply to threads for a while (such as my Selflessness or Homsexuality/Evolution threads) because I see a lot of overly tangential arguments being made. For instance...
There are different tiers of knowledge. Tiers explain their preceding tiers. Tiers create a deeper understanding of something, A, in a transitive-property-like fashion. (A=B, B=C, C=D, therefore A=D.)
Does our understanding ever reach a point where we need not ask "why" any further? Does...
Perhaps I should have been more clear. By "debate," I am not referring to formal debate, though the guidelines are generally transferrable. I am referring to debate in the same sense as discussion—where an idea is contemplated and argued. Sorry for the confusion.
When I made this thread it was entitled "The Efficacious Forum Participant." I have not changed it since, nor did I even know that titles could be changed.
There was no planning involved in this introduction. This was simply an unwieldy amount of Ne being spewed at those with a moment to spare.
I'm not entirely sure what you are referring to about "forum browsing."
I don't see your objective.
This thread was intended to guide those who seek help with their debate technique—not to ensure that they conform to what I believe constructs a worthwhile debate. Furthermore, part of what I believe constructs a worthwhile debate is when all participating individuals "only agree with someone...
Many of us spend our free time here on this forum. This forum is a place where ideas are born, spread, and grown. In order for an idea to be born, one must wonder; in order for an idea to be spread, one must convince; and in order for an idea to be grown, one must consider.
The Birth of the...
I think I know what you mean: sometimes we make decisions without all of the information, and sometimes we make decisions when we have gathered a lot of information. What I still don't quite understand is how I have exhibited a preference of judging over perceiving. Could you provide examples...
I don't see INTP as a goal, per se, as I do believe that all personality types have their advantages and disadvantages (and not to mention that I believe MBTI is flawed, though still relatively accurately), but I have found that my prospecting trait easily dominates my judging trait. I'm not...
Correct, nice job! I realized the mistakes I made when I tried to calculate those, so I apologize for the confusion. Here are a couple of other ways that this can be solved:
You're exactly right about this being the equivalent of the Monty Hall problem. I modeled this off of it (despite a few bumps along the road).
With that said, does his original guess influence the probabilities?
Hint: Does his original guess influence whom of the three he meets with?
Ok, I'm deeply sorry. There's still a flaw. (Don't hurt me. :p) I am almost positive I have it right this time. Here is the revised story problem:
I worked out the math: it works now. Sorry for the confusion.
This site uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. We have no personalisation nor analytics --- especially no Google.