• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Maggie Gyllenhaal

murkrow

Active Member
Local time
Today 6:53 AM
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
435
---
Location
Montreal
Ruined "Dark Knight".

1. she's not attractive enough to match the script.
2. she's not a strong enough actor.
 
Local time
Today 5:53 AM
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
90
---
Location
Arlington, Texas
I did think it was odd that they chose Maggie (especially to play opposite Christien Bale :confused:) but I am a fan of hers. Loved her in Secretary and Stranger Than Fiction.
 

PreAlgebra

Member
Local time
Today 3:53 AM
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
56
---
Location
Phoenix
I totally disagree. I think that it was a great role for her because she is not a typical actress for that role and she pulled it off well. I think that she is very gorgeous and a good actress. Have you seen Stranger Than Fiction? She is amazingly hot in that.
 

Radioactive_Springtime

Active Member
Local time
Today 6:53 AM
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
314
---
Location
Maryland
maybe they should have used her brother and just called it brokebatman...i hate myself for that one.
 

PreAlgebra

Member
Local time
Today 3:53 AM
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
56
---
Location
Phoenix
Oh, thats a good one^ I would hate myself too for it.
 
Local time
Today 5:53 AM
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
90
---
Location
Arlington, Texas
I totally disagree. I think that it was a great role for her because she is not a typical actress for that role and she pulled it off well. I think that she is very gorgeous and a good actress. Have you seen Stranger Than Fiction? She is amazingly hot in that.


I haven't seen the movie yet but I'm sure she performed fantastically (again, I am a fan) but she just seems odd for that type of flick. Sometimes the leading man matters, too. But Christien Bale is an enigma so maybe he doesn't count. :D
 
Local time
Today 5:53 AM
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
90
---
Location
Arlington, Texas
Ruined "Dark Knight".

1. she's not attractive enough to match the script.
2. she's not a strong enough actor.


Oh wait! I just realized that you said she ruined the movie. Haven't seen it but I doubt that.
 

Decaf

Professional Amateur
Local time
Today 3:53 AM
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
2,149
---
Location
Portland, OR, USA
I thought she brought a hell of a lot more chutzpah to the role than Katie "Pretty Face" Holmes. I couldn't believe Katie would stand up to that kind of intense pressure, but I could believe that of Maggie. She wasn't perfect, but she was better.
 

fullerene

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 6:53 AM
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
2,156
---
how the hell did the supporting actress ruin the dark knight for you? Heath Ledger could have filmed that movie with muppets and it would have been half decent.

edit: oops, second sentence didn't quite make sense.
 
Last edited:

Radioactive_Springtime

Active Member
Local time
Today 6:53 AM
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
314
---
Location
Maryland
how the hell did the supporting actress ruin the dark knight for you? Heath Ledger that movie with muppets and it would have been half decent.

Ledger's joker is pretty much the best there will ever be. Ever.
 
Local time
Today 5:53 AM
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
90
---
Location
Arlington, Texas
I thought she brought a hell of a lot more chutzpah to the role than Katie "Pretty Face" Holmes. I couldn't believe Katie would stand up to that kind of intense pressure, but I could believe that of Maggie. She wasn't perfect, but she was better.


:eek: You can't compare Maggie Gyllenhaal and Katie Holmes. F***ing Katie Holmes?! COME ON!!

:D
 
Top Bottom