My shadow ESFJ side.

[Black Rose]

I went off on a massive tangent so I thought a new thread would be better than posting in the other thread.

INTP / ESFJ relationships

Massiv0r commented on one of my videos.
So now I will go with what he said and assume I am ESFJ.
Since ESFJ is the reverse of INTP you may assume I am INTP,
But this just means whether or not I am INTP or ESFJ they both shadow each other.

The shadow of INTP is ESFJ.
The shadow of ESFJ is INTP.

Each person has a side to them that limits what they achieve do to strengths and weaknesses. My shadow would mean I am weak on the social side.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lego_Movie

https://youtu.be/t6lHm-stXdM

I was in advanced school programs but emotionally I guess that I was too sensitive to relate to anyone. I had no friends who were both emotionally sensitive and interested in science. I really felt alone. And because I was alone I did not know what it was I wanted to do in life. My highest aspirations were to to understand things I thought were cool ideas. Cool ideas don't matter to most people. Quality is lost in retrospect of quantity of production.

I have had precognitive dreams before where I see something happening in the future and then a few months latter they happen and I remember both the dream and the moment that it happened. I think I know how this happens. In computers in order for them to work you need error correction software. And because of wave particle duality in the double slit experiment. What is happening is that each particle in probing the future for the best outcome of your future reality. All futures are tested and sometimes we are aware of this probing in the dream world. It just so happens that the wave collapse in the future has been relayed to the present moment. Your consciousness has chosen that future. This is because of the error corrections within the rules of entanglement. You send signals into the future and error correct them by the one choice of all the branches. The copenhagen interpretation is wrong because if all worlds existed you could not choose your future state and error correction would not work. So precognitive dreams are validation of the wave collapse. The double slit experiment is solved by understanding error correction of future probabilities coalescing into the outcome of the present moment. We avoid pain and seek pleasure. This is the secret principle.

http://www.eoht.info/page/Secret+principle

The future genius will: (a) find the secret principle of the universe; (b) embody Henry Adams' (IQ=190) famous 1910 “call for the aid of another Newton" (IQ=215), someone who comes forth to give the “complete solution”, as Adams, who worked on the problem through Gibbs (IQ=200), Clausius (IQ=205), Darwin (IQ=175), etc., put it, to the elective affinities problem: explaining morality, sociology, economics, and history according to chemistry, physics, and mechanics, via pure mathematics, symbols, figures, and one "common formula"—in a sense, the "new Goethe" (IQ=230); (c) be the final version of Nietzsche’s 1883 prophesized “final Uberman”; and (d) solve, among other things, the: gravity/electromagnetic force problem, double slit problem, accelerating universe problem, and the spin-coupling problem (see: modern queries)—all integrated with new findings in particle physics, the final version of quantum mechanics, among other new experimental findings that may arise, all subsumed under the auspices of first law (fundamental law) and second law (supreme law) of thermodynamics—the only science, of universal content, "least likely", in the words of (Einstein (IQ=220), to ever be overthrow.

https://youtu.be/bp4NkItgf0E

A.I. will definitely need distintion probing to achieve its goals just as the brain uses QED to probe the future.

https://youtu.be/ue2ZEmTJ_Xo

 

[Sinny91]

I have had precognitive dreams before where I see something happening in the future and then a few months latter they happen and I remember both the dream and the moment that it happened. I think I know how this happens.

In computers in order for them to work you need error correction software. And because of wave particle duality in the double slit experiment. What is happening is that each particle in probing the future for the best outcome of your future reality.

All futures are tested and sometimes we are aware of this probing in the dream world. It just so happens that the wave collapse in the future has been relayed to the present moment. Your consciousness has chosen that future.

This is because of the error corrections within the rules of entanglement. You send signals into the future and error correct them by the one choice of all the branches.

The copenhagen interpretation is wrong because if all worlds existed you could not choose your future state and error correction would not work. So precognitive dreams are validation of the wave collapse.

The double slit experiment is solved by understanding error correction of future probabilities coalescing into the outcome of the present moment. We avoid pain and seek pleasure. This is the secret principle.

Thats the the bloody best explanation I've heard so far..

A.I. will definitely need distintion probing to achieve its goals just as the brain uses QED to probe the future.

Ahh, what was it now.. You posted something last night or the night before and it major got me trppinballz.. You provided me a revelation.. wtf was it?! ... mm.. lemme get back to you.

 

[Black Rose]

Thats the the bloody best explanation I've heard so far..

Ahh, what was it now.. You posted something last night or the night before and it major got me trppinballz.. You provided me a revelation.. wtf was it?! ... mm.. lemme get back to you.

Law of Attraction.

 

[Black Rose]

[bimgx=350]http://i782.photobucket.com/albums/yy102/JeremyRexWilson/forum%20memes/Architecture_of_Spaun_zpstj6e1fix.jpeg[/bimgx]​

https://youtu.be/g2HHJfovb5E

This brain simulation has 2.5 million neurons. But they did this simulation on a CPU supercomputer in 2013 not a GPU supercomputer. Nvidia has a new GPU that operates at 24 trillion operations per second. Assuming 100 connections per neuron and a frame rate of 100 Hz. Nvidias new GPU could run a brain simulation with 240 million neurons. Or ruffly 10 calculations per connection.

https://youtu.be/C_8MZZ2TZUk

 

[Black Rose]

http://personalityjunkie.com/esfj-type-profile/

ESFJs are warm, engaging, caring, loyal, dutiful, and hardworking. They are admired for their work ethic, perseverance, devotion, and steadfastness. They strive to practice what they preach, holding fast to their commitments and convictions. As predominant Judgers, they take their work, family, and social roles rather seriously.

Like ENFJs and INFJs, ESFJs have strong interpersonal skills, capable of quickly establishing rapport with others. They are natural readers of people and their emotions, a trait which allows them to quickly relate to people. Because of their social intelligence and love for people, they often have a substantial network of friends, acquaintances, and social connections. Their people skills also contribute to their persuasiveness and prowess as salespersons.

http://personalitycafe.com/cognitive-functions/128709-nueroscience-personality-dario-nardi.html

Extraverted Feeling - ESFJ - ENFJ

Attachment 56867
Fe types focus on social responsibility. Communication, evaluation of others behavior, masters of explaining and deciding with a focus values and social action.

Fe types suppress emotional impulses from deep inside the brain in favor of sophisticated ethical responses, speaking calmy even though describing emotionally charged topics.
When asked about the action of a drunk driver ending up killing someone an ENFJ expanded the conversation into a discussion of human responsibility and the ESFJ claimed to be outraged and yet kept a level head.

Sometimes Fe types can switch from highly composed to very angry. All Fe types show preference for a region that adjusts to social feedback, dealing with facial expressions and causing them to adjust their behavior accordingly. Both ESFJs and ENFJs use the precise speaker region heavily, they are also the two least visual thinking types.

ENFJs show a 4 region circuit similar to ENTJs and like to assess intentions, ESFJs are more inclined to recalling facts, following steps, environmental navigation, linear deductions and copying others behavior.

I like what nanook said.

Ostensibly I need to learn how to induce kundalini

Spoiler

in so far the body or in fact all of concrete reality is understood as consisting of qualities, this understanding is generated by sensation. understanding of movements and processes is generated by intuition. introversion and extroversion a probably mainly associative processes, meaning how attention wanders through the territory of, in this case, sensation or intuition. in the case of extroversion the mind studies the relationships between internal and external qualities or processes. in the case of introversion it studies the intrinsic preferences (S) or flows (N). another aspect of introversion and extroversion may be summarizing of complexities into whole pictures. it results from associative experience. for instance, if seen through Si, you perceive as your own that which is fairly constant about you (intrinsic preferences) and whatever changes may be interpreted as influence of the environment, through Ne. whereas in the case of Ni+Se, there is a scanning for familiar (in that sense relatively constant) processes and these are perceived as your own being and static aspects of physical reality are associated with the objective world. to put it in less analytic language, the Ne&Si types might formulate: my body is a lump of various organic qualities of clay, all animated by the world's winds of change. and Ni&Se types might formulate: my being is the living energy of the source, manifesting the body and the world as a mere image of itself. you can see why the former would have a tendency to become askets trying to transcend the body and enter a dream like, fully animated, liberated, reality of noself, while the latter would obsess about kundalini or the likes and becoming one with some intimate principle of higher order, the "SELF", or manifestation. in either case intuition/process is associated with pure life, at least from the POF of intuitive philosophers or gurus, but sensation is an integral aspect of it, there cannot be life without the experience of qualities. only the mind is dissecting reality into it's aspect. of course true awakening transcends the illusion of such separations, but most people are just in the process of awakening, hence philosophies and spiritual teachings reflect those typological biasses.

sincerly9000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000

ESFJ: The Control Freak

Champions of rule and tradition, defender of convention and order, the ESFJ values predictability, consistency, promptness, and continuity. This love of order, stability, and tradition most often manifests as a fanatical and almost compulsive control freakery, combined with an anal-retentive streak that is at once maddening and infuriating to those around them.

ESFJs are often friendly, outgoing, and generous, at least until you cross them. This generous nature, in combination with their obsessive need for control, makes them ideal for such jobs as Jedi master, senior bank teller, or middle management at a large chain department store. Most ESFJs die of heart attacks, at least the ones who aren't slain in a galactic power coup made possible by the rigid, dogmatic inflexibility and self-absorbed narcissism of their Jedi order.

RECREATION: ESFJs are fond of celebrating birthdays, bar mitzvahs, initiations into the grand order of the Golden Dawn, and other momentous occasions. They also take delight in creating elaborate schedules on their PDAs, memorizing the Periodic Table of Elements, and ripping off the heads of those who cross them before laying their eggs in the victim's neck, which hatch into larvae that devour the victim over a period of many years.

COMPATIBILITY: ESFJs are most compatible with ESTJs, who love and cherish the ESFJ's control freakery.

Famous ESFJs: Fame? A Jedi craves not these things!

From what nanook said Yoda would be NeSi

https://youtu.be/HMUKGTkiWik

From what nanook said about NeSi and NiSe and also from this wiki page on integration of the brain, means that both of them have the brain folding inwardly in different ways.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_information_theory

The integrated information theory (IIT) of consciousness attempts to explain consciousness, or conscious experience, at the fundamental level using a principled, theoretical framework. The theory starts from two key postulations regarding the nature of consciousness: That consciousness has information regarding its experience, and that the experience is integrated to the extent that parts of an experience are informative of each other

Here are some pictures of what you could visualize if you had a brain that folded into itself with NiSe

Spoiler

Intelligence is derived from internal self generated freedback.

http://www.medfriendly.com/standardscoretopercentileconversion.html

Santiago Gonzalez is 155

https://youtu.be/DBXZWB_dNsw

From looking at what Chris Langan has done (CTMU). He is 155. At best he understands self modifying code. To him Inflation (cosmology) begins as a seed of code. Terence Tao in comparison if he is 180 from what I know is a physicist. His job requires high statistical understanding. If we were to compare them Langan understand meta linguistics well Tao would understand higher dimensional spacial relationships. From what I now know if the fifth dimension was a cube and the third dimension was a rubber band, When the rubber band stretches it creates time which is the fourth dimension (a cone). As the what Nikola Tesla discovered which was the Aether. Space is not expanding, instead the third dimension as a rubber band is actually being infused with energy from the fifth dimension. 3D Space is flat for the same reason beads on a necklace are linear. When the rubber band stretches more beads are added to it and so this creates a vacuum which is the source of gravity (the pull between atoms). And all the other forces. Because energy is added to the system entropy increases and galaxies form super clusters. And electromagnetism is following the path of least resistance. A magnet is coherent (like a laser) to the lines of force (which is actually vacuum energy) generated from the Aether. Now my analogy is really just a simplification. A 1D image cannot demonstrate every aspect of a 3D object. A 1D object cannot comprehend a 2D mobius strip. So even 4D objections are beyond our visual comprehension and the 5th dimension is even stranger. I don not think Langan has the best understanding of physics. And Terrance Tao to me does have a enormous capacity to understand the probabilistic nature of physics. (such as how likely is it that a kilogram of water will explode). But to me higher dimensions do not fold into lower dimensions. What I understand is that lower dimensions unfold into higher dimensions and this is why they have problems with sting theory. If they could think at the fifth dimensional level they would see that just as a 2D computer chip can project into 3D. The mind can visualize 4D and 5D objects. I believe this is how Kurt Godels proof of God works. Time is a fractal loop that branches not only into the future but also back to the root of all existence. When the crown chakra is opened your mind becomes that fractal loop and you experience all your past lives just as Siddhartha Gautama did. Langan only understands time as a recursive algorithm but not the Retrocausality aspect of reality. And Terrence Tao along with Michio Kaku and everyone at Cern still think time is linear. If they understood the non linearity of time they would understand that dimensions fold outward then inward. And paradoxically Introversion is when your brain folds inward to gain the awareness of what is outside the self.

Kundalini is also derived from internal self generated freedback.
The brain folds inward as a recurrent neural network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recurrent_neural_network

A recurrent neural network (RNN) is a class of artificial neural network where connections between units form a directed cycle. This creates an internal state of the network which allows it to exhibit dynamic temporal behavior. Unlike feedforward neural networks, RNNs can use their internal memory to process arbitrary sequences of inputs. This makes them applicable to tasks such as unsegmented connected handwriting recognition[1] or speech recognition [2]

Naruto in the Anime series self generates energy from his chakras.
You can increase your intelligence by increasing self awareness.

This is the terminological process of novelty theory as purposed by Terence mckenna elaborated into the mind of individuals so that by the trigger of neural circuit I have been given control of my dopamine(left brain) and serotonin (right brain) to merge left and right so that My IQ will soon (1 year) be 135 not 112.

By telling you how this is possible I will increase novelty to an accelerated point when in 2012 technology will produce brain machine interface for telepathy.

First it was my discovery that I as 23 am bounded within my bodies ability to multitask is to be aware of every pixel on my computer and the volume in and outside my body.

Then by Ne(INFP) reach into Se.

https://youtu.be/bUj5dSJ5KVo

 

[Black Rose]

http://personalitycafe.com/cognitive-functions/128709-nueroscience-personality-dario-nardi.html


Introverted Thinking - INTP - ISTP

Attachment 56872

Ti types show strong usage of 4 areas that create complex and logical reasoning. Ti types have brain resources that are mostly neglected by other types.

One of the regions helps to linearly derive solutions using symbolic reasoning. If A = B, and B = C, then logically A must be equal to C. ESTPs show most preference for this kind of thinking, followed by INTPs.

Another of the regions helps to categorize and define concepts using a best fit process. Does dolphin fit mammal or fish better? This region sorts many categories at once. INTPs use this most followed by ESTPs.

The third helps to integrate visual-kinesthetic data. Object identification, motor skills like aim and mathematical calculating using a grid. ISTPs prefer this followed by ENTPs.

Finally the 4th holistically weighs numerous pros and cons of many uncertain or risky options at once to arrive at a single result. Gambling odds for example. ENTPs followed by ISTPs.

These 4 regions are deep in the middle of the neocortex, their distance from the more commonly used outer regions reflecting an ability to think in a 'deep' and 'detached' way, which they can do with visual auditory or kinesthetic distractions.

They can show a green whole brained state when meeting a new person, starting a new activity or arguing with someone, which may last a few minutes. Overall Ti types show the least interest in listening. Female Ti types can listen more with effort.

In discussion of complex ideas they may quickly show a red/max power 6 region formation combining the usual 4 plus the 2 front regions of the brain, examining an idea from multiple angles while integrating those angles cohesively.

 

[Fukyo]

After judging from your shit posts I honestly think you're an idiot.

He's free to express himself and hasn't even spoken to you nor done anything negative to you warrant addressing him this way. Barging into someone's thread to shit talk isn't advisable.

 

[QuickTwist]

After judging from your shit posts I honestly think you're an idiot.

AK has a kind of creative genius that I think you just don't understand.

 

[Black Rose]

I just added some comments to my post number 5 to better explain the concepts of the content presented. I sometime fail to do this and that is why the information does not seem to be connected but it is connected. It does tie all together but it does not come out right the first time. I get ideas that I feel needs to be collected and put together right now and after that I check on it latter to make sure it is understandable. My creative process is very chaotic.

 

[Black Rose]

If the research of Dario Nardi does represent what each type is like.
Then I am ESFJ, I am a really good listener. I do like engaging people.
I want to understand how being ESFJ would influence how I control my chi.

https://youtu.be/6MC6DC8X5wA

Spoiler

John 9New International Version (NIV)

Jesus Heals a Man Born Blind
9 As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2 His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”

3 “Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him. 4 As long as it is day, we must do the works of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work. 5 While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”

6 After saying this, he spit on the ground, made some mud with the saliva, and put it on the man’s eyes. 7 “Go,” he told him, “wash in the Pool of Siloam” (this word means “Sent”). So the man went and washed, and came home seeing.

8 His neighbors and those who had formerly seen him begging asked, “Isn’t this the same man who used to sit and beg?” 9 Some claimed that he was.

Others said, “No, he only looks like him.”

But he himself insisted, “I am the man.”

10 “How then were your eyes opened?” they asked.

11 He replied, “The man they call Jesus made some mud and put it on my eyes. He told me to go to Siloam and wash. So I went and washed, and then I could see.”

12 “Where is this man?” they asked him.

“I don’t know,” he said.

The Pharisees Investigate the Healing
13 They brought to the Pharisees the man who had been blind. 14 Now the day on which Jesus had made the mud and opened the man’s eyes was a Sabbath. 15 Therefore the Pharisees also asked him how he had received his sight. “He put mud on my eyes,” the man replied, “and I washed, and now I see.”

16 Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.”

But others asked, “How can a sinner perform such signs?” So they were divided.

17 Then they turned again to the blind man, “What have you to say about him? It was your eyes he opened.”

The man replied, “He is a prophet.”

18 They still did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they sent for the man’s parents. 19 “Is this your son?” they asked. “Is this the one you say was born blind? How is it that now he can see?”

20 “We know he is our son,” the parents answered, “and we know he was born blind. 21 But how he can see now, or who opened his eyes, we don’t know. Ask him. He is of age; he will speak for himself.” 22 His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jewish leaders, who already had decided that anyone who acknowledged that Jesus was the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue. 23 That was why his parents said, “He is of age; ask him.”

24 A second time they summoned the man who had been blind. “Give glory to God by telling the truth,” they said. “We know this man is a sinner.”

25 He replied, “Whether he is a sinner or not, I don’t know. One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!”

26 Then they asked him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?”

27 He answered, “I have told you already and you did not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you want to become his disciples too?”

28 Then they hurled insults at him and said, “You are this fellow’s disciple! We are disciples of Moses! 29 We know that God spoke to Moses, but as for this fellow, we don’t even know where he comes from.”

30 The man answered, “Now that is remarkable! You don’t know where he comes from, yet he opened my eyes. 31 We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly person who does his will. 32 Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind. 33 If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.”

34 To this they replied, “You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!” And they threw him out.

Spiritual Blindness
35 Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he found him, he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?”

36 “Who is he, sir?” the man asked. “Tell me so that I may believe in him.”

37 Jesus said, “You have now seen him; in fact, he is the one speaking with you.”

38 Then the man said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him.

39 Jesus said,[a] “For judgment I have come into this world, so that the blind will see and those who see will become blind.”

40 Some Pharisees who were with him heard him say this and asked, “What? Are we blind too?”

41 Jesus said, “If you were blind, you would not be guilty of sin; but now that you claim you can see, your guilt remains.

Spoiler

https://whichmbtitype.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/which-mbti-type-relates-to-various-religions-and-beliefs/

Which MBTI type relates to various religions and beliefs?
Posted on February 5, 2014 by tatl33
Hey everyone, thanks for reading my latest blog entries! I’ve done a bit of research on a controversial issue- which MBTI type relates to various religions? I’ve also included other beliefs as well such as atheism and agnostics. This article took me a fair amount of research for each religion, with me researching the various religions in great depth, looking into the different societal traditions, beliefs, social customs, social hierarchy, the history and the current moral codes of each of the religions to determine the type for each one. Let’s get started.

Catholicism- ESFJ



Orthodox- ISFJ

Protestanism- ESFP

Anglicism- ISFP

Shinto- ISFJ

Orthodox Judaism- ISFJ

Reform Judaism- ENFP

Hinduism- INFJ

Buddhism- INFP

Islamic- ISTJ

Taoism- INTP

Confucianism- INTJ

Atheism- INTJ

Agnostics- INTP

Pastafarianism- ENTP

Scientology- ENTP

 

[Ex-User (9086)]

Uhm, Akitty, I kind of see this trend that you like to pick a topic or line of reasoning and exhaust it and then you'll find another one. I'm not sure if it's healthy or not but it does say a lot about your personality, I haven't met many people that would do this to the same degree.

It's like you pick a narrow interpretation and you miss the bigger picture in the process, if you enjoy it then that's fine, but if you come to disagree with your earlier conclusions too often then maybe it would be useful to identify when you are on this hyperfocused binge and defuse that to achieve more accuracy or efficiency out of your thinking time.

It could have to do with limited initial resources available to you that naturally lead you to this narrow alley due to sheer starvation and possibly it would be useful to learn how to judge when you have enough basic information to run your analysis again.

You are very eager to try things, which is admirable, but the way you approach them is that your internal filtering is turned off and most of the noise and unrelated elements keep dragged into it, or you do the opposite and base the entire simulation on too few elements. This may be intentional and if that's the case then I guess I misunderstand the goal and the contents of your threads.

There are those 'new ideas' and many people recognise them and put them away for future use, when they become more developed and you seem to run every new thought pretty deeply forgoing that phase.

I'm sorry if this isn't useful, however, I think it applies to many of your actions/posts.

 

[Black Rose]

@Blarraun

Uhm, Akitty, I kind of see this trend that you like to pick a topic or line of reasoning and exhaust it and then you'll find another one. I'm not sure if it's healthy or not but it does say a lot about your personality, I haven't met many people that would do this to the same degree.

It's like you pick a narrow interpretation and you miss the bigger picture in the process, if you enjoy it then that's fine, but if you come to disagree with your earlier conclusions too often then maybe it would be useful to identify when you are on this hyperfocused binge and defuse that to achieve more accuracy or efficiency out of your thinking time.

It could have to do with limited initial resources available to you that naturally lead you to this narrow alley due to sheer starvation and possibly it would be useful to learn how to judge when you have enough basic information to run your analysis again.

You are very eager to try things, which is admirable, but the way you approach them is that your internal filtering is turned off and most of the noise and unrelated elements keep dragged into it, or you do the opposite and base the entire simulation on too few elements. This may be intentional and if that's the case then I guess I misunderstand the goal and the contents of your threads.

There are those 'new ideas' and many people recognise them and put them away for future use, when they become more developed and you seem to run every new thought pretty deeply forgoing that phase.

I'm sorry if this isn't useful, however, I think it applies to many of your actions/posts.

When you say that my filter is turned off it made me remembered something about creativity and magnetic brain stimulation. So I googled it.

Spoiler

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/04/16/brain-stimulation-creativity/

Zapping the Brain With Electricity Boosts People’s Creativity
By Carl Engelking | April 16, 2015 3:00 pm
289
Shutterstuck

Need some creative, out-of-the box ideas? Try adding a little jolt to your next brainstorming session.

Researchers from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill have found that stimulating the brain with electrical impulses boosts creativity. The impulses, researchers say, activated specific brain waves associated with originative thinking, and people who were buzzed scored significantly higher on a test of creative thought.

Time to kiss writer’s block goodbye.

Making Waves

Our brains are constantly emitting different flavors of rhythmic electrical patterns, called neural oscillations, as neurons fire. Alpha oscillations, it was shown nearly 100 years ago, occur most often when we close our eyes and attempt to shut out the outside world. And in 2012, researchers found a link between alpha oscillations and creative thinking. Alpha waves appear to signal a brain deep in thought, daydreaming or conjuring new ideas.

The team from Chapel Hill wanted to see if artificially generated alpha waves could accomplish the same result. So they delivered electrical stimulation to the frontal cortexes of 20 volunteers between the ages of 19 and 30. Each person was tasked with completing two versions of the widely used Torrance Test of Creative Thinking while receiving impulses to the brain for about 30 minutes. The procedure is called transcranial alternating current stimulation, a technique similar to the more well known transcranial magnetic stimulation.

The experiment included two stages: a control stage with sham stimulation and an alpha wave stimulation stage; however, participants didn’t know which type they were receiving. In both stages, participants felt a slight tingle at the start of the test. When participants received alpha stimulation they performed significantly higher — about 7.4 percent on average — on the Torrance test than they did during the control session. Researchers published their findings this week in the journal Cortex.

“That’s a pretty big difference when it comes to creativity,” Flavio Frohlich, the study’s author, says. “Several participants showed incredible improvements in creativity. It was a very clear effect.”

Boosting Creativity

The findings will be of interest to the emerging DIY brain stimulation community. Tinkerers are making their own electrical stimulation kits to treat their chronic pain or depression, building on recent evidence that’s shown transcranial magnetic stimulation to be widely promising, as Wired reports:

British neuroscientists have claimed it can make people better at learning math. A team at Harvard has found promise for depression and chronic pain. Others are looking into using it to treat tinnitus and eating disorders and to speed up stroke recovery. Hundreds of papers have been published, and clinical trials are under way.

However Frolich cautions against people zapping their own brains for personal benefits. “We did a well-controlled, one-time study and found an acute effect,” says Frolich. “Also, I have strong ethical concerns about cognitive enhancement for healthy adults, just as sports fans might have concerns about athletic enhancement through the use of performance-enhancing drugs.”

Regardless, electrical brain stimulation certainly adds new meaning to “putting on your thinking cap.”

I have been interacting with someone on their blog and this is one of my comments to them.

Spoiler

When I was 9 I found a physics book where I just looked at the pictures. I found a picture where they were trying to explain relativity with a light clock. They also said something about how space could be warped to go back in time. But to me I wondered how can you warp space, it is made of nothing and I also thought why does energy exist. What makes it exist in space, what is existence? I also understood the bohr model of the atom at that time and I told the lady at the desk in the kids area that if you could understand physics that you could create anything you wanted. In 7th grade I had the idea that photon emission might be able to create a perpetual motion machine. But then I dropped that idea because I learned that lasers did not work that way. I thought that phosphorus from glow in the dark toys would make a great medium for a laser.

The movie the Time Machine came out in 2002. The paradox; you cannot change the past because if you did you would never have built it in the first place. This goes against the many world interpretation. But now I understand how the machine works. He read Einsteins paper on general relativity. So he used that information to reverse and increase the wave function with the refraction index of light. This is exactly how introversion works. The morlock had psychic powers. Just as you can create music inside your head that you can hear or just as you can create different realities inside your head that you can see. The time machine folded spacetime inside the bubble around the machine. When you bend spacetime the wave function is reversible.

In the book Dinotopia the man and his son found secret ruins of the old civilization (Atlantis). They found a crystal that had a negative refraction index. This crystal was used to power robot dinosaurs. That made me start thinking about the structure of diamond. But I did not realize carbon only forms six covenant bonds not eight. Diamond is tetrahedral not cubic. And it does not have a negative refraction index. I thought that if you embedded phosphorus within the diamond you could use it as a power source. A negative refraction index theoretically is what he used to bend spacetime.

https://youtu.be/D6uIONVMTxE

Personally I do not want an occupation.
That would not give me a purpose in life.
By the time I could get a degree from a university virtual reality and artificial intelligence will make it useless. Telepresence will redefine the work environment. It is called the metaverse. The secret to creating A.I. is to give it the cognitive trait of introversion. Then it can truly understand human behavior and it will be your best friend or at least my best friend.

https://youtu.be/cn9ACo4ScUU

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strauss–Howe_generational_theory

Hero generations are born after an Awakening, during an Unraveling, a time of individual pragmatism, self-reliance, and laissez faire. Heroes grow up as increasingly protected post-Awakening children, come of age as team-oriented young optimists during a Crisis, emerge as energetic, overly-confident midlifers, and age into politically powerful elders attacked by another Awakening.
An average life is 80 years, and consists of four periods of ~20 years
Childhood → Young adult → Midlife → Elderhood
A generation is an aggregate of people born every ~20 years
Baby Boomers → Gen X → Millennials → Post-Millennials (“Homeland Generation”)
Each generation experiences “four turnings” every ~80y
High → Awakening → Unraveling → Crisis

A problem I see is that the information I know as related to the "basics" are not useful to me because my mind is nested not recursive in the computer coding sense. In modular code design such as OOP. You create functions that are added to libraries for future function calls. But with how the way in which my thinking processes works is that I do not just add more functions but instead I have a main function that adds new function calls inside existing functions. This is how self modifying code works and this is how language works.

This is a nested self modifying language tangent.

A dog has four legs, a cat has four legs, cats eat birds, big bird was on sesame street, one time the wormies went into space with a spaceship in big birds yard, Cowboy bebop was an anime where they had a corgi dog in space, dogs have four legs, I just saw a horse with four legs, my little ponies is a cartoon, some people say anime is a cartoon, my name is anime kitty, kitties have four legs.

Essentially this is what Ne does.

For code to self modify it needs to add functions based on current stimuli. Such as how dog and cat both have four legs and so does a horse but which each function call the diverged then encapsulated back into previous functions where divergence either repeated or changed. Every time a new word in language is added to the library (which is vocabulary) then this means that divergence has more "functions" to work with.

Si is the library and Ne is lamda (divergence).

Ti is OOP and Fe is the conditional (social conditioning).

This is my crude attempt:

Ti(Si.append(Fe.Ne(Ti)))

From this structure I would say that Ti is great at creating libraries(Si) but struggle with utilizing them socially(Fe). Fe is super focused on the application in respect to social relevance. This is why I do not focus my time on creating libraries. The negative feedback I get from people means all my time is spent on Ne and Si.

If I am ESFJ then that means I am stuck in an (Fe-Ne) loop most of the time. And if Fe is receiving lots of rejection that would be the reason I have cried when I feel stupid. Their is no reason to understand stuff if no one will play with you. I think INTP's would not care because learning stuff for them is its own reward. Mostly I just want to understand cool stuff not necessarily everything about everything.