Hadoblado
think again losers
- Local time
- Tomorrow 7:17 AM
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 7,535
Those pacifists probably made a conscious ethical rejection, rather than having a lack of social affective integration. Not necessarily all though, so you could have a point.
A lot of psychology is dominated by descriptive... Actually hold that thought I'm pretty sure someone else just posted the exact same explanation in this or one of the other threads on psychopathy/Asperger's. The take home message is that these definitions are not made to be logical, but functional. It's frustrating at times, but it leaves the Ti dom a niche to fill in the future at least :P
I would argue (from a position of ignorance mind you) that the difference is that the pacifist in Attilla's horde is demonstrating a behaviour that is within a normal expression range of neuroanatomical capacities. He's less aggressive, but even in this context, that is likely highly adaptive given his probable inferior fighting abilities. In the context of today's society, psychopathy is almost always maladaptive (though one should always be considerate of the psychopath's differing goals).
BTW, just for clarity, I'm not arguing for an outright rejection of your position, as it is a valuable insight, just that it is likely less clear cut than you have articulated.
A lot of psychology is dominated by descriptive... Actually hold that thought I'm pretty sure someone else just posted the exact same explanation in this or one of the other threads on psychopathy/Asperger's. The take home message is that these definitions are not made to be logical, but functional. It's frustrating at times, but it leaves the Ti dom a niche to fill in the future at least :P
I would argue (from a position of ignorance mind you) that the difference is that the pacifist in Attilla's horde is demonstrating a behaviour that is within a normal expression range of neuroanatomical capacities. He's less aggressive, but even in this context, that is likely highly adaptive given his probable inferior fighting abilities. In the context of today's society, psychopathy is almost always maladaptive (though one should always be considerate of the psychopath's differing goals).
BTW, just for clarity, I'm not arguing for an outright rejection of your position, as it is a valuable insight, just that it is likely less clear cut than you have articulated.
