I sincerely doubt she had complete certainty. She might be certain she experienced something, but I doubt she drew any positive conclusions about why she did.
No. Yes, it does seem that the loudest, most obnoxious, zealous bigots claim to be irreligious/ atheist LOL (their religion is their professed lack of one: IRONY anybody?)
'Tis always been so...these are the same folks whose mindset it was that has always been behind taking things to either extreme; yes, 500 years ago they would have been burning heretical witches at the stake ROTFLMAO at the idiocy on display!
But statistically speaking atheists are less extreme in their views of things. Thinks you's judging atheists based on onlineatheists based on the Internet.
In any case hitler and Stalin proved that you don't need per se religion to be a dogmatic fundamentalist. It can be substituted with another ideology.
To consider atheism an ideology one needs to consider atheism based on an online-vocal group of professed atheists who seem to want it to be an ideology. Of course those people are retarded dogmatics in their own right. Letting them represent atheism is just a cheap way to get yer hands on some ammo. Besides if one were to be as selective about which group(s) of religious people should be the basis of theism things get a lot uglier.
This site uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. We have no personalisation nor analytics --- especially no Google.