Look INTP Forum

[Cavallier]

Re: Sigastrialomundinjia

If it only posted unconstructive spam would a deletion be better than just a ban? To remove the clutter I mean.

Deleting posts and accounts makes things messy. It's good to have a clear and uncompromised record of the various things done around.

Please amend the ban announcement 'Sigastrialomundinjia is permabanned for being Lyra.' to reflect the strength of your evidence and the actual reasons for banning. I did not insult the members s/he insulted and it shouldn't be stated as proven fact that I did.

Blah. Blah. Blah. You may or may not have been Sigastrialom...whatever. However, your often disingenuous words and behavior mean your pleas are suspect. You have discredited yourself to this forum and to the mods. Please don't pretend you care so much about your reputation on this forum. Regardless of if you do or not your defense here is enough. The members here can read this and form their own opinions. However, since it is impossible to be 100% certain that Sig and you are the same I will amend Sig's banning to reflect that he was banned as a Troll and a Dupe suspect without naming anyone specifically.

Satisfied?

 

[Duxwing]

Re: Sigastrialomundinjia

Brown-nose harder?

Nope. I meant it genuinely.

-Duxwing

 

[Cavallier]

Also, I have combined both threads related to Sig into one thread for coherence and moved them to the Crime and Punishment section.

 

[Lyra]

Re: Sigastrialomundinjia
Quote:
Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold
If it only posted unconstructive spam would a deletion be better than just a ban? To remove the clutter I mean.
Deleting posts and accounts makes things messy. It's good to have a clear and uncompromised record of the various things done around.
Blah. Blah. Blah. You may or may not have been Sigastrialom...whatever. However, your often disingenuous words and behavior mean your pleas are suspect. You have discredited yourself to this forum and to the mods. Please don't pretend you care so much about your reputation on this forum. Regardless of if you do or not your defense here is enough. The members here can read this and form their own opinions. However, since it is impossible to be 100% certain that Sig and you are the same I will amend Sig's banning to reflect that he was banned as a Troll and a Dupe suspect without naming anyone specifically.

Satisfied?

Well, I tend to regard myself as automatically 'discredited' amongst the good and honorable rank and file of whatever sub-borough of bourgeois-ville I stumble across, given that I can't contort myself into their mundane requirements for what a human must be. But that doesn't mean I'm not making a-- genuine-- point that needs-- genuine-- accuracy and representation. The supposed disingenousness you talk about is besides the point in so far as actual truth-seeking about ideas and life itself is concerned.

To those more interested in truth and potential than petty respectability and self-congratulatory intellectualism, the supposed village-politics level disingenousness is an irrelevancy.

That aside, I haven't been 'disingenous' in the sense you defined for many years, on this forum. Only genuinely what I am, in contradiction to models of personality and modes of behavior/assumption which proliferate. That's relevant to those interested in personality and how humans work, as is my research (more extensive than all but perhaps one or two other individuals on this forum) into the personality models under discussion. And all this bullshit and slander arising from terrible moderation is not my doing. So your dismissive 'you have history, you're discredited' attitude is just more authoritarian laziness. I know you'll just dismiss this as well, but the fact of the matter is that I'm being swamped with irrelevant drama as a result o Kuu's error and somebody else making an account, and all the shit being thrown at me is being justified by things that happened years ago and a clusterfuck of muddled, mundane thinking and assumptions with no evidence to back it. I'm not making trouble here, just dealing with unexpected bullshit. So please don't 'blah blah blah' me. I'm just dealing with what's coming my way.

Hopefully this thread/drama/festival of incompetence will be closed soon.

 

[Cavallier]

Well, I tend to regard myself as automatically 'discredited' amongst the good and honorable rank and file of whatever sub-borough of bourgeois-ville I stumble across, given that I can't contort myself into their requirements for what a human must be. But that doesn't mean I'm not making a-- genuine-- point that needs-- genuine-- accuracy and representation. The supposed disingenousness you talk about is besides the point in so far as actual truth-seeking about ideas and life itself is concerned.

That aside, I haven't been 'disingenous' in the sense you defined for many years, on this forum. Only genuinely what I am, in contradiction to models of personality and modes of behavior/assumption which proliferate. That's relevant to those interested in personality and how humans work. And all this bullshit and slander arising from terrible moderation is not my doing. So your dismissive 'you have history' attitude is just more authoritarian laziness. I know you'll just dismiss this as well, but the fact of the matter is that I'm being swamped with irrelevant drama as a result o Kuu's error and somebody else making an account, and all the shit being thrown at me is being justified by things that happened years ago and a clusterfuck of muddled, mundane thinking and assumptions with no evidence to back it.

Lol.
And with that I hope this will be the end of it.

 

[Kuu]

Re: Sigastrialomundinjia

Sorry for being off topic but I just realize that you are form Jurassic Park. How do you like it and are you going to be in the 4th movie when it comes out?

It sucks. No.

If it only posted unconstructive spam would a deletion be better than just a ban? To remove the clutter I mean.

Like Cava said, we usually rather leave things as they happened, but I took the time to remove the most egregious and disruptive ones.

 

[Puffy]

@Kuu @Cavallier @Lyra

I've spoken with Sparrow recently and he told me that he created the account. I agree that a changing of the reason for banning is at least in order.

(didn't read all of siga's posts, for the record, thought this one had a few interesting points.)

 

[Puffy]

Re: Sigastrialomundinjia

Deleting posts and accounts makes things messy. It's good to have a clear and uncompromised record of the various things done around.



Blah. Blah. Blah. You may or may not have been Sigastrialom...whatever. However, your often disingenuous words and behavior mean your pleas are suspect. You have discredited yourself to this forum and to the mods. Please don't pretend you care so much about your reputation on this forum. Regardless of if you do or not your defense here is enough. The members here can read this and form their own opinions. However, since it is impossible to be 100% certain that Sig and you are the same I will amend Sig's banning to reflect that he was banned as a Troll and a Dupe suspect without naming anyone specifically.

Satisfied?

Sorry, only just read that.

Either way, felt people should know to clear the air.

 

[Dormouse]

Not that this will convince anyone, but it wasn't Lyra...

Edit: and he didn't know about it.

 

[redbaron]

I wonder why a hyperdimensional alien emissary would even care about being misrepresented on a forum with a few hundred active users, let alone whine so much over it.

 

[Lyra]

Numbers are irrelevant. I'm writing something to work out a perspective/make a point, and distortion distorts that endeavor. That would apply to an audience of 1, even if my posts on this forum weren't being read by specific groups of non-members (lor might be able to confirm that for you).

Also, I don't appreciate being forced to accept having insulted people or used phrasing which I haven't, wherever I am.

 

[Lyra]

@Kuu @Cavallier @Lyra

I've spoken with Sparrow recently and he told me that he created the account. I agree that a changing of the reason for banning is at least in order.

(didn't read all of siga's posts, for the record, thought this one had a few interesting points.)

@Kuu @Cognisant @Cavallier @Duxwing

You are stupid and incompetent.

 

[Duxwing]

@Kuu @Cognisant @Cavallier @Duxwing

You are stupid and incompetent.

I'm soooo butt-hurt.

-Duxwing

 

[Cognisant]

Hey I'm pretty compatent for a stupid person

 

[Cavallier]

And I'm pretty stupid for a competent person. At least that's what my mommy tells me.

Anyway, cool. I'm glad that it is cleared up. Thanks Puffy.

 

[Artsu Tharaz]

Oh my god who could it be???