• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Psychological Warfare

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 9:36 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
Any theories?

I was reading about it (muhahahahaa) when it occured to me that this would have to be the most pre-emptive form of warfare, so it seems odd how relatively little effort has gone into developing it, I mean compared to warfare itself.

E.g. Shock & Awe, really? REALLY? Oh c'mon a 2yr old could think of that.
And they do.

What are the objectives of psychological warfare?
What strategies would achieve those objectives?
What tactics would you use to conduct those strategies?
What technology would support those tactics?
 

TheScornedReflex

(Per) Version of a truth.
Local time
Tomorrow 8:36 AM
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
1,948
---
Terror tactics are a form of psychological warfare. Of course, nowadays that is like waving a "Attack me* sign. Or just have lots of oil :D

The objective would be to take the will to fight from the enemy. Or confusion :angel:, the most bestest type. Have the enemy so confused that they cannot coordinate anything. Then take them apart as you see fit .

And for kicks, you could do sorties over their cities and drop "make love not war" fliers. After a week of doing this at the same time everyday.. Napalm the fuckers...

Basically, troll the Fuck out of them.
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 9:36 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,478
---
Mostly? Getting people to believe that some-other-group is stupid, delusional, and evil, so that when their governments say they have to go to war with these people, to free women, children, whoever, that you won't question further, such as why their governments mostly seem to invade countries that have something they want, and never countries that have nothing they want, but are doing all those horrible things to an extreme.

Great way to control a populace. Plenty of scientific research put into it too, and a lot of the science is really useful, if you want to control a populace.
 

TimeAsylums

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 2:36 PM
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
3,127
---
[bimgx=250]http://www.penguin.com.au/jpg-large/9780140455526.jpg[/bimgx]

How disgraceful of you, an N, asking for advice on PsyOps.
 

Absurdity

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 1:36 PM
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
2,359
---
I think the effectiveness diminishes as the cultural distance between the target and the orchestrator increases. Looking at the history of the CIA, you see just how many times they screwed up, and even a lot of their successes were pure luck. However I'd say the New York Times does a great job at home.
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 9:36 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,478
---
Any theories?

I was reading about it (muhahahahaa) when it occured to me that this would have to be the most pre-emptive form of warfare, so it seems odd how relatively little effort has gone into developing it, I mean compared to warfare itself.
Used to think so. But then I found out that in World War I, Britain already had its own propaganda bureau, which had lots of the famous great writers of the time in its ranks, people like H. G. Wells, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Their stories were probably full of propaganda.

Oh, yeah, and a substantial part of psychology is about how to manipulate people. There's a hundred years of experiments in almost every situation imaginable. As an example, the Millgram experiments would also be useful to understand how to make people kill people they think are innocent, and how far you have to push them, and how often it will work.

What are the objectives of psychological warfare?
To make you think that you are making your own mind up, to do exactly what your government and corporations want you to.

What strategies would achieve those objectives?
Mostly? Getting people to believe that some-other-group is stupid, delusional, and evil, so that when their governments say they have to go to war with these people, to free women, children, whoever, that you won't question further, such as why their governments mostly seem to invade countries that have something they want, and never countries that have nothing they want, but are doing all those horrible things to an extreme.

Great way to control a populace. Plenty of scientific research put into it too, and a lot of the science is really useful, if you want to control a populace.

What tactics would you use to conduct those strategies?
Mostly? Hype up your ego, and plant lots of suggestive sub-conscious messages. The messages are individually not that much of a deal. But, when combined with all the hundreds of others bombarding you, may not affect an INTJ with a strong will like yourself, but could easily convince the other 99% of the population to do almost anything. Push the ego in the direction people want to believe in, and they won't look back, because that will require them to admit they were foolish for believing in the ego-drivel in the first place.

So, you have to control the information providers, i.e. the scientists, the media, the schools, and the internet.

You can control the media directly, because they only produce things for money. But to do that, you have to get their bosses, the ones who run and own the media companies, on your side. So you'll have to offer them big bribes under the table, and lucrative media contracts. Probably have to arrange with them what news stories will be revealed in advance, as well, to give them the edge, so they look like they're always on the ball.

You can't control the scientists directly, because they are supposed to be impartial. So what you do, is establish many national academies of higher learning all under your government's control, and you ensure that you set up scientific funding to be done in advance, such as with a grant board. Then you simply ensure that on every board, at least one of the members of the board, in particular, the guy who is authorised to offer the funding on your behalf, i.e. on the behalf of the government and corporations, is being instructed by his superiors to follow your (plural) instructions. Then he simply only approves those grants that are going to encourage those sorts of ideas that would generate the kind of thoughts and feelings that would generate the actions that you want from the populace.

You can control the schools directly, because governments set the curriculum and oversee the schools, and so decide what your kids are taught, how, and by who.

The internet is much eaiser to control. Studies have been done into it. Simply pay a few thousands people to make tons of internet articles, forum posts and Youtube videos that make your point for you. You'll also need to have companies that pay people to scan online and other sources for voices of reason, to ridicule them and to ensure that their web pages get pushed to the back of any internet search. But it's chicken feed.

This will only work, when it comes from hundreds of sources, and in such ways as to be almost negligible and invisible to anyone looking for any one source.

You'll also have to start early. It takes years to program a populace properly, 10-20 years for the next generation. So you have to plan well in advance.

What technology would support those tactics?
Anything where the above can be accessed. Print, TV, radio, films, the internet. Especially the internet, as that stuff goes viral pretty quickly, and is way cheaper than paying for the others.
 

Reluctantly

Resident disMember
Local time
Today 10:36 AM
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
3,135
---
Believe it or not, part of what the Special Forces do in the military is psyOps, where highly trained soldiers infultrate different cultures with the intent to sway political sentiment in a particular direction. Most of the time, there's a belief that those in the military are stupid, but these people not only have to be fit and have superior combat training, but they also need to learn languages fluently and think on their feet like a spy and blend into a culture completely foreign to their own.

But interesting enough, you could argue that every politician has their own form of psyOps that they employ to get them where they are and allows them to bring popular sentiment to their favor. I guess that's how I view politics now; I don't think political reason really matters anyway when the truth becomes what people come to believe and not what is necessarily happening behind the scenes. So PsyOps is probably much more powerful than flat out war or destruction.

But let's be honest. Is it more fun to blow shit up or give speeches and hold press conferences and do little meetings and public gatherings and public services to get people to believe what you want them to? Sometimes destruction is the easiest thing to do; what easier way to deal with people that disagree with you then to ... eliminate them from existence. It's a very extreme thing to do, but at the same time very powerful.

I'm not even sure if this is what you're talking about though. Just bored.
 

Kuu

>>Loading
Local time
Today 2:36 PM
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
3,446
---
Location
The wired
it seems odd how relatively little effort has gone into developing it

Oh to be so naïve...

On the contrary dear Cog, I would advance the idea that we live in an era drowned under relentless psychological warfare, and it is in fact the most intense and most prevalent form of warfare today. An era of smoke and mirrors, television and internet where information can be shared globally instantly but verification is nigh impossible.

Have you ever stopped, laid down and actually thought that you can't really be sure of the reality of things? That most of what you "know" from media or history, could be absolute bullshit and you'll never be able to know for sure what is truth? It's a chilling prospect.
 

just george

Bull**** Artist ENTP 8w7
Local time
Tomorrow 6:06 AM
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
881
---
Location
That madhouse planet in the Milky Way
All of us are assaulted by psyops all day, every day. The amount of money that has been spent figuring out how people work, the resources available to actually do it, and the detail to which those studying it have gone, is absolutely staggering.

To give you an example, millions were spent figuring out what refresh flicker rate used in televisions elicits different emotional states, so that people could become sexually excited, or fearful, or whatever based not on what television show was on, but on the flicker rate.

Everything you see - EVERYTHING - is deliberate. The colors people wear, the vernacular they use, the length of the clip, the lighting, the size of the speakers head relative to their body, the preceding program they were watching - all of it is formulaic, to create the same mental state in a person watching television, for example, that is the same as low level theta state hypnosis.

Why do you think they're going after the internet and alternative media with everything they have? Once someone snaps out of the spell, it is very difficult to re hypnotize them.
 

ZenRaiden

One atom of me
Local time
Today 9:36 PM
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
5,657
---
Location
Between concrete walls
In warfare psychology is always in parallel with conventional fighting. Just taunting your enemy or using magic could be considered psychological warfare so basically it is used since day one. Given what we know about animals they also use psychological weapons.

Mythology was old day propaganda. Like God is angry at Spartants yady yady yady ya and so we must go there and fight them.

The only thing I wonder is if conventional fighting can even be considered split from psychological fighting.
 
Local time
Today 9:36 PM
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
949
---
Location
Upstairs
the public schools and mass media are all tools of the enemy of humanity. They've been used to wage war against the free mind for 100 years now. And they have generally been winning every single battle thus far. Its all -100% of it- psy-ops. The enemy of humanity has perfected their techniques of mass producing delicious zombie food for their hordes of walking brain dead slaves. Yes, I am talking about the NWO cabal.

Their leverage is maximized in elementary school. Its all subconscious mind programming.

"What are the objectives of psychological warfare?"
Control of the collective average human mind in order to maximize government-corporate Power/Money for the selective few who would reign supreme at any cost

"What strategies would achieve those objectives?"
Psy-ops (psychological operations i.e. mass manipulation via the 'education' system k-12 + mass media programming)

"What tactics would you use to conduct those strategies?"
'government' takeover of schools and television/ newspapers/ radio. 501c3 churches of course, too.

"What technology would support those tactics?"
television, obviously. radio, obviously. Their big target right now is reigning in the internet. Don't want the sheep to get any big ideas. If they can't get control of the internet I am going to predict that the internet will be as important to individual freedom and liberty (everything opposite of slavery which we currently are under generally) as the printing press was 500 years ago to opening up channels of thought for the free mind. You'd better believe its gonna be a hell of a fight over the internet, though.

Of course, the enemy ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS veils their true intentions (power, control, money) in "we have to protect the children" and "its in the interest of public safety" in order to appeal to their masses of pet zombies.

^^favorite zombie food of all time.
 

ZenRaiden

One atom of me
Local time
Today 9:36 PM
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
5,657
---
Location
Between concrete walls
Big ideas need to be established and require time and a uninterupted continuum where generations of people find the idea good enough to be motivated to enforce it. Brainwashing people actually makes this big idea business much quicker. In communism the communist would say something and bam / there it is. Deal with it. In capitalism its always someone the other, the aliens, the goverment, the president, the .........
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 9:36 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
@TimeAsylums
@Kuu

One of the best ways to change someone's mind is to ask leading questions, to bring up a topic of conversation and keep the ball rolling in the direction you want, it gets people thinking, makes them think it was their idea.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 9:36 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,393
---
What exactly is a free mind?

:D
 

TimeAsylums

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 2:36 PM
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
3,127
---
@TimeAsylums
@Kuu

One of the best ways to change someone's mind is to ask leading questions, to bring up a topic of conversation and keep the ball rolling in the direction you want, it gets people thinking, makes them think it was their idea.

Ok, Socrates. But yes, the "Why?" method very effective, we (forum members) constantly use it on each other which can be seen in our interactions. Always forcing someone to explain their logic hahaha :D
 

Reluctantly

Resident disMember
Local time
Today 10:36 AM
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
3,135
---
@TimeAsylums
@Kuu

One of the best ways to change someone's mind is to ask leading questions, to bring up a topic of conversation and keep the ball rolling in the direction you want, it gets people thinking, makes them think it was their idea.

I'd say this only works if they are open-minded though. The close-minded already made up their minds at the start; you won't change their minds, but maybe impede them from influencing other people who are more open-minded. It's only the open-minded that can listen.
 

OldCoyote

Trickster
Local time
Today 3:36 PM
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Messages
98
---
Location
East Texas
Physiological war is as old as war itself. And I'm not talking about just the physiological aspect of conventional war either, I mean the ruthless brain F'n mind wars. Examples:

Gurkha's - sneak into enemy camp, find enemy soldiers sleeping, kill every other one.
Ninja - sneak into enemy camp, lower enemy flag, raise opposing flag, sneak out of camp.
Viet-Cong - sneak up on enemy foxhole, kill the night watchman, leave the one asleep.
Native American - Scalp a white man alive, let him write the history. ;)

What's interesting to me is how much the NA's influenced American warfare. Rewind back to the colony's and the imperialist nations (France, Britain, Spanish) war was waged in line formation very much like a board game. The colonist had a little culture shock when they first witnessed the typical NA war strategy; Shoot and move, Ambush's, kidnaping (asymmetrical war) ..

The same strategy America used in its war for independence. American forces always had Indian scouts with them, They eventually awarded these scouts military benefits and a scout insignia (1850'ish).. The insignia had two arrows crossing each other and U.S.S on the top. When the last Indian scout retired after WWII, the unit was reorganized into the 1st Special Force's - carrying the lineage of the U.S.S and the crossed arrows into the modern world known as Green Berets..

As to why the native's fought like they did... That's another topic in itself.. :)
 
Top Bottom