a bearded robocop
- Local time
- Today, 10:31
- May 3, 2012
I'm having a hard time following this stream of consciousness you've posted. Let me just summarize my view:At last, the usual contrarian post from pornotator. I am not singling me out either, though I am spinning the op into my observations. Yes by saying someone is incorrect, see you post here, you are attempting to validate you're own position by diminishing the the other's. The nature of forum debate usually btw... I have never claimed to transcend anything, herd included--self evident since I am here. The question "what is wrong with you" automatically assumes a divergence from perceived normalcy. There is nothing wrong with me, nor the motivation of the original post. What is wrong is that you ignore the applied peer pressure inherent in most of the threads, and you choose often some follow up poster as a basis for your own ad hominem attacks on irrelevant details you choose to make central.
- I have no problem with the OP.
- You have a tendency to contrast yourself with the plebeian masses.
- You are missing the point, as kris said.
- Your description of "90% of the posts here" is inaccurate.